Arbor Age

Arbor Age May 2014

For more than 30 years, Arbor Age magazine has been covering new and innovative products, services, technology and research vital to tree care companies, municipal arborists and utility right-of-way maintenance companies

Issue link: http://read.dmtmag.com/i/310920

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 14 of 27

www.arborage.com Arbor Age / May 2014 15 trees look bad. In the vast majority of cases, the real reason the tree looks "butchered" is because it doesn't belong there. It is my belief that the "tree butcher" label should be handed over to the likely well-intended person who improp- erly selected and planted the tree in the fi rst place — not to the folks who are ultimately charged by law with maintain- ing the required space between the vegetation and electric facilities. When factoring in the availability of planting choices and the implications of tree and power line confl icts (fi res, outages, electrocutions, and billions of ratepayer maintenance dollars spent each year on mitigating these threats), there are absolutely no valid reasons for planting a large tree underneath power lines. So, next time you run into a customer who claims the utility has butchered their tree, consider going through the following checklist with them: 1. What was there fi rst, the tree or the wires? If the answer is the wires, you might explain to them that the wrong tree was planted in the wrong location. 2. Was the work done in accordance with ANSI A300 stan- dards? If so, and the tree looks bad, you might explain the aesthetic issues are really a result of a bad planting choice. 3. How often has the tree been pruned by the utility in the past? If the answer is more than once every 5-7 years, you might explain that the tree should be removed and replaced with a more suitable tree or shrub for that location. I think you will fi nd out, as I have, that in the vast majority of cases, the utility company performed the tree work consistent with industry best practices. They were stuck managing some- one else's poor planting choice. The frequent aesthetic allegation of "butchered" trees should not be levied haphazardly against the utilities, but rather imposed on the people who caused the problem in the fi rst place. Stephen R. Cieslewicz is president and chief consultant of CN Utility Consulting Inc. With more than 30 years of industry experi- ence, Cieslewicz is a recognized expert in utility vegetation man- agement (UVM). In working with utilities, regulators and service providers around the world, Cieslewicz has been directly involved in the bulk of tree and power line issues of note. He was a principal UVM investigator for the Joint U.S./Canada Power Systems Out- age Task Force, a principal author of all UVM related reports follow- ing the August 14, 2003 blackout, and is a member of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) FAC-003 draft- ing committees. Cieslewicz has testifi ed as an expert at many signifi - cant legal, regulatory and legislative hearings and is a past president of the Utility Arborist Association (UAA).

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Arbor Age - Arbor Age May 2014