Landscape & Irrigation

September 2014

Landscape and Irrigation is read by decision makers throughout the landscape and irrigation markets — including contractors, landscape architects, professional grounds managers, and irrigation and water mgmt companies and reaches the entire spetrum.

Issue link: http://read.dmtmag.com/i/369214

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 22 of 43

www.landscapeirrigation.com September 2014 Landscape and Irrigation 23 tually extend to public lands beyond school grounds and playing fields, and it's going to affect landscapers and their options for weed control. The good news is that Kao-Kniffin and colleagues are researching alternative means of effective weed management, and are keen to share their findings with lawn care companies and school facilities managers. Kao-Kniffin has partnered with a pilot group of four school districts to manage their playing fields, primarily soccer fields, and to conduct original research there. "We're starting off small this year; then, based on the results, we will expand into different areas of New York, but also Maine and Massachusetts." She and her team are talking with school facilities managers and eventually lawn care professionals too, as many school districts are increas- ingly contracting out field management to commercial lawn care providers. The chemical breakdown Kao-Kniffin gets frequent inquiries from companies about what pesticides are allowed to be used on school grounds. Even schools that don't fret over aesthetics have to be able to control clover, for example, because the risk of bee stings to children poses a liability. Prior to the enactment of CSPFL in New York, schools used glyphosate-based products, but that is not permitted under the ban. Kao-Kniffin studied the list of organic pesticides that are approved by the Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI) to determine which of these were allowable under the CSPFL (for example, 20 percent acetic acid is OMRI-approved but is consid- ered a risk to children by CSPFL). She had to consider both the active and inert ingredients to make sure they were EPA-classified as minimum or reduced risk. The list of organic pesticides that met all these criteria was very short. She and fellow weed scientists from Cornell Turfgrass and the Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center (LIHREC) evaluated those minimum- and reduced-risk her- bicides for use on turfgrass. They found that the most effective herbicide was likely to be cost prohibitive for most schools. (Read about this at http://tinyurl.com/pycg758). "Until more effective organic herbicides are available at an affordable cost, school grounds management in New York State Top Right: The Child Safe Playing Fields Law (CSPFL) restricts the use of conventional pesticides from K-12 school grounds, playing fields, and daycare centers, both pub- lic and private. Photo by Michelle Sutton. Bottom Right: Many other states are considering following New York's lead on limiting pesticide use on school grounds. Photo by Michelle Sutton "Some contractors go overboard with adding fertilizers. This can result in extensive phosphorus application, whereas nitrogen should really be the focus when it comes to turf density in most sites." — Dr. Jenny Kao-Kniffin

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Landscape & Irrigation - September 2014