Tobacco Asia

Volume 18, Number 2

Issue link:

Contents of this Issue


Page 17 of 71

18 tobaccoasia In a modern, enlightened world a commitment to harm reduction in the tobacco industry should be paramount. This not only applies to people who work in the industry, but to all parties, from sci- entists and health professionals to pressure groups and governments. All have a responsibility to en- sure a regulatory and social environment in which new, safer products can reach the market. Millions of people legally choose to consume tobacco products. Their health and safety should come first. Millions more depend on the industry for their livelihoods, including many low income workers in some of the most deprived areas of the world. The only reasonable, ethical approach is to promote and support scientific research into mak- ing products safer. But too often this is not the case. Safer alter- natives such as Snus and e-cigarettes are regularly demonized or restricted by interested parties in the so-called "tobacco wars". Input from tobacco companies attracts the same approbation. Recently, Chris Proctor, chief scientific officer at British American Tobacco (BAT), lamented: "Despite massive strides in external acceptance of the role our science can play in underpinning tobacco harm reduction, there remains pressure Safety First: BAT Leads Call on Harm Reduction "If nicotine could be provided in a form that is acceptable and effective as a cigarette substitute, millions of lives could be saved." By Mike Phillips

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Tobacco Asia - Volume 18, Number 2