City Trees

January/February 2024

City Trees is a premier publication focused on urban + community forestry. In each issue, you’ll learn how to best manage the trees in your community and more!

Issue link: https://read.dmtmag.com/i/1514101

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 29 of 39

been less extensively explored, although urban plant and bird biodiversity are found to be greater in high- er-income neighborhoods. Urban bird diversity follows HOLC grades, with bird species composition today being well-predicted by race-based zoning from 80 years ago, but diversity of other plants and animals in relation to historic HOLC grades have been relatively unexplored. Our analysis in Baltimore was led by researchers from the University of Maryland College Park, Johns Hopkins University, the USDA Forest Service, and the University of Maryland Baltimore County. We used a 2018 street tree inventory, which included vacant potential tree locations in addition to existing live and dead trees, to calculate street tree occupancy rates by neighborhood. We also analyzed existing trees by size class to reflect past (larger trees) and current (small trees) investment in the urban forest. Implications Our findings have implications for ecosystem services across the city of Baltimore. Redlined neighbor- hoods were locations of recent tree planting activities, with a high occupancy rate of small (young) trees. However, the community composition of these young trees in D-graded neighborhoods was more likely to be dominated by fewer tree species within a neigh- borhood, particularly red maple (Acer rubrum). A lack of larger trees suggests lower rates of ecosystem service provision, from cooling effects to carbon storage to stormwater capture. In addition, a less diverse urban forest may be less resilient to pest and disease out- breaks and support less biodiversity of insect herbivores and the arthropods and birds that feed on them. As a result, residents of redlined neighborhoods may receive fewer ecosystem services now and, depending on their resilience, may be in jeopardy of losing the continued provision of critical ecosystem services into the future. Overall, while the negative effects of redlining remain detectable in present-day street tree communities, there are clear signs of recent investment in Baltimore. The city has sustainability goals of increasing tree canopy cover to 40% by 2040 and increasing overall levels of biodiversity. Our results regarding small (young) trees in D-graded neighborhoods may reflect the tree canopy goal and the City's work to address tree inequities through its TreeBaltimore initiative. Decisions on which trees to plant where are complex, involving both top-down deci- sions by TreeBaltimore and private developers, as well as bottom-up actions by contracted organizations that are planting trees limited by what species they can access. >> For biodiversity experts, street trees provide a unique study population because trees can live for many decades, and patterns of street tree size, distribution, and diversity reflect both present-day and historical public policy and management decisions. 30 CityTREES

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of City Trees - January/February 2024