Tobacco Asia

Tobacco Asia 71 III. A new realist phase of "trudging through mud" Some may see only chaos: right and wrong blurred, smokers and non- smokers entirely polarized, regulators and enforcers at a loss. Yet through the surface disorder, a deeper pattern emerges. China's tobacco control is not stalling—it is advancing in a more challenging and profound man- ner, entering a phase where deep governance and complex multi-party bargaining coexist. This phase has five defining characteristics: 1. From legislative rollout to enforcement growing pains For two decades, the dominant narrative was legislation and expan- sion—from nothing to something, from indoors to outdoors, from first- tier cities nationwide. Now, enforcement is the bottleneck. The Shenzhen bus stop conflict arose not because there was no rule against smoking, but because there was no one to enforce it in real time. This is an unavoidable stage in any rule-of-law progression. Only through such clashes does the system realize that law on paper is insufficient without robust enforce- ment—driving investment in resources, personnel, and technology. 2. From top-down directives to multi-stakeholder bargaining Tobacco control was once a matter of government issuing orders. Now it is a complex arena of negotiation among government, non-smok- ers, smokers, media, and even opportunistic actors. As these incidents show, the issue can be weaponized for traffic and views, or exploited as a wedge by those with ulterior motives. This makes simple administrative commands far harder to execute, yet it also forces government to learn to China's tobacco control efforts are also shifting from legislation to enforcement, with increasing recognition that the goal is to protect non-smokers and reduce harm—not pit smokers against non-smokers. "enforce within a glass house." Enforcement must be fully documented and communicated with precision and speed—no more vague, opaque resolutions. This forced transparency, in the long run, tempers the rule of law. At the same time, active public participation— even when excessive—shows that tobacco control has taken deep root as a societal consensus that no rever- sal can undo. 3. From moral appeal to rights-based con- frontation "Smoking is harmful to health" was once a mor- al exhortation. Now, the core of conflict is a direct collision between non-smokers' right to health, smok- ers' freedom of behavior, and enforcers' authority to maintain order. People no longer settle for "what you're doing is wrong"—they demand "you must stop now." This awakening of rights consciousness is posi- tive, yet it also brings the risk of unchecked private enforcement. Through such intense interpersonal clashes, society is gradually learning where the bound- aries of self-help remedies lie. 4. From physical bans to psychological and interest-based challenges A defining marker of this new phase is that simple physical separation—posting signs, drawing zones—is no longer sufficient. Psychological acceptance and em- bedded interests must now be addressed. These con- flicts, unpleasant as they are, function like CT scans, pinpointing the weak links in tobacco control and com- pelling policymakers to shift from impulsive bans to- ward science-based, well-supported policies. 5. Progress is measured not by the absence of conflict, but by society's growing capacity to resolve it A decade ago, smoking at a bus stop was consid- ered trivial. Today, it is filmed and goes viral. This zero tolerance for uncivil behavior represents a qualitative leap in social civilization. Amid the heated debates trig- gered by each trending incident, alongside emotional invective, substantial rational voices emerge—iden- tifying what is right and wrong, what should be im- proved and what should be upheld. Such deliberation on justice is itself evidence of civilizational progress. In sum, beyond the surface chaos, China's to- bacco control has bid farewell to the romantic phase of one-sided enthusiasm and entered a new realist phase of "trudging through mud." It can be termed the phase of "precision governance in a high-conflict environment." Posting a poster no longer solves any- thing; what must be built is a closed-loop system com- bining rapid response, lawful dissuasion, reasonable penalties, and adequate smoking facilities. The cur- rent turbulence, noisy as it is, is precisely the necessary growing pains of a Chinese society progressing toward healthier, more law-based, and more civilized public life. So long as we do not abandon the effort because of the friction, each resolved incident brings us one step closer to a smoke-free environment. And that is progress.

• Cover