Better Roads

November 2014

Better Roads Digital Magazine

Issue link: https://read.dmtmag.com/i/412488

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 16 of 43

Better Roads November 2014 15 dollar of cost. • Wood noise abatement walls produce a 0.38 insertion loss per dollar of cost over their life cycle, among the lowest of the materials tested. Wood walls are constructed with a sus- tainable material that blends in with a natural or residential background. But with time, the wood will warp and shrink leaving cracks in the wall which limit noise reduction po- tential. • Steel noise abatement walls produce a 0.38 insertion loss per dollar of cost, among the lowest of the materials tested. Steel is durable and able to withstand severe temperatures and conditions, such as sunlight, moisture, ice and salt, with a proper coating. But they may be electrically conduc- tive and generate heat with sun exposure which prohibits landscaping from growing near the wall. "Based upon the acceptable levels of noise reduction, life cycle cost analysis, and the durability of the product, the concrete noise walls seem to perform better than the other noise wall materials," they add. "The TNM, version 2.5, is an acceptable tool to predict noise levels for planning purposes." 7H[W,1)2WRRUYLVLWZZZEHWWHUURDGVFRPLQIR Reader questions lack of auger extensions In reviewing our September 2014 Road Science, a reader took issue with the apparent lack of auger extensions used in California with an extended screed shown in the cover illustration (see Rubber Expands, September 2014, pgs. 6-10, or visit www.betterroads.com). "[The image] appears to be an example of a poor paving practice that most, if not all, state DOTs disallow, that being the use of a screed extension without the accompanying use of an auger extension," writes Jeff Benefield, road construction engineer at Alabama DOT. "There's most likely no auger extension being used [as] there's no apparent support mechanism for the extension. "Alabama DOT specifications require the auger extension to be no further than 18 inches away from the edge of the screed," Benefield adds. "This requirement insures that fresh mix is easily supplied to the edge of the screed rather than rolling or tumbling its way to the edge. Many paver manufacturers even prescribe the use of extendable tunnels when a screed is extended this far." Thanks to Mr. Benefield for his comments. However, auger extensions are not required by Caltrans' new (2009) performance-based specifications, which give contractors more leeway in how they pave with asphalt. Correction: In the same article, Dr. Paola Bandini, P.E., New Mexico State University, is referred to using the masculine article. Instead, "he" is a "she." We apologize for the error. RoadScience

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Better Roads - November 2014