City Trees

January/February 2015

City Trees is a premier publication focused on urban + community forestry. In each issue, you’ll learn how to best manage the trees in your community and more!

Issue link: https://read.dmtmag.com/i/443459

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 9 of 39

ÌÞÊ/Àiià $EVELOPING 4OOLS )N ORDER TO MAKE THIS SYSTEM FIELD READY WE NEEDED TO DEVELOP A MASTER SPREADSHEET THAT IDENTIFIED THE DISTINGUISHABLE FEATURES AND TOLERANCES OF ALL THE TREE SPECIES ON OUR PLANTING LIST 9OU CAN DOWNLOAD THIS SPREADSHEET HERE HTTPWWWNYCGOVPARKSORGTREES STREETTREEPLANTINGSTEPS 5NDER 3TEP 3URVEY SEE THE HYPERLINK FOR hDATA SHEETv %ACH ROW REPRESENTS A DIFFERENT TREE SPECIES AND EACH COLUMN REPRESENTS VARI OUS CATEGORIES OF A TREES BIOLOGICAL QUALITIES DROUGHT TOLERANCE FLOOD TOLERANCE SHADE TOLERANCE FORM LEAF COLOR ETC 4HESE DATA WERE DRAWN FROM 53$! &ACT 3HEETS AND OTHER RELEVANT SOURCES WRITTEN IN AN URBAN FORESTRY CON TEXT %ACH COLUMN IS FILTERABLE SO A FORESTER CAN FIND A TREE SPECIES FITTING VARIOUS SPECIFIC CRITERIA IN A MATTER OF SECONDS 9OU WILL NOTICE THAT OUR DEPARTMENT ADDED SOME COLUMNS CUSTOMIZED TO OUR OWN NEEDS YOU MAY WANT TO TAILOR THIS SPREADSHEET TO YOUR OWN PROGRAMS NEEDS #OMBINING THE SCIENCEBASED RESEARCH COLLECTED IN THIS SPREADSHEET WITH ADDITIONAL FIRSTHAND FIELD KNOWLEDGE IT WAS POSSIBLE TO ASSIGN THESE TREE SPECIES TO THEIR MOST APPROPRIATE BIOTOPES SEE COLUMNS IN FAR RIGHT 7E USED AN hXv TO SIGNIFY THE FIRST CHOICE AND AN hMv FOR THE hMAYBESv OR SECONDARY CHOICES 4HE PROCESS OF CHOOSING WHICH TREE SPECIES CORRESPONDED TO EACH BIOTOPE WAS QUITE CHALLENGING AND UNDERWENT MANY REVISIONS 4HE TREES NEEDED TO BE DISTRIBUTED BASED ON THEIR BIOLOGICAL TOLERANCES TO MATCH THE GIVEN SITE CONDI TIONS 4HE LISTS ALSO HAD TO BE GENEROUS ENOUGH SO THAT FORESTERS HAD REALISTIC OPTIONS GIVEN NURSERY AVAILABILITY 0LUS SOME BIOTOPES ARE MORE COMMONLY FOUND IN THE FIELD THAN OTHERS SO TREE SPECIES CHOICES HAD TO REFLECT THAT DISTRIBUTION ,AST WE WANTED TO ASSIGN TREES TO BIO TOPES WHERE THEY WOULD BE PUT TO BEST USE RELATIVE TO ALL THEIR OTHER BIOTOPE OPTIONS CONSIDERING FACTORS OF TREE GROWTH POTENTIAL LONGEVITY AND SITE POTENTIAL !PPLICATION 5SING THIS METHODOLOGY WE ARE ABLE TO APPROACH A PLANTING SITE AND CLASSIFY IT AS A CERTAIN BIOTOPE FAIRLY EFFICIENTLY 7HEN THE FORESTER COMES ACROSS ONE OF THE LESSCOMMON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS EG BEING IN A COASTAL FLOOD ZONE THE SPREADSHEET CAN BE FILTERED BY THIS CRITERION WHICH FURTHER REFINES THE TREE SPECIES LIST FOR THAT BIOTOPE 3INCE IT IS COMMON FOR SURVEYING TO TAKE PLACE MONTHS BEFORE A FORESTER KNOWS NURS ERY AVAILABILITY THIS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CAN COME IN HANDY $URING THE SITE VISIT THE FORESTER CAN ASSESS THE THREE CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING THE BIOTOPE MAKE NOTE OF THAT BIOTOPE NUMBER AND DOCUMENT ANY ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS 4HEN SPECIES CAN EASILY BE Ì«iÊÎ\Ê1ÀL> iÀV>]Ê7ÀiÃ]Ê/ÀiiÊ i`ÊÊx{» Ì«iÊ££\Ê1ÀL>,iÃ`iÌ>]Ê7ÀiiÃÃ]Ê/ÀiiÊLi`Ê{Ó»ÊqÊx{» Ì«iÊ£n\Ê>`ÃV>«i]Ê7ÀiiÃÃ]Ê/ÀiiÊLi`ÊÊx{» %XAMPLE 0HOTOS

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of City Trees - January/February 2015