Water Well Journal

April 2016

Water Well Journal

Issue link: https://read.dmtmag.com/i/655200

Contents of this Issue


Page 9 of 67

reduces amount LEAD in drink well O BEL LEAD RE TRID AR C s ON E O t of UBL els SOL ter to leve king wa W the 'S A EP EDUCTI DGE N al/Municip Industrial/Mun dential Resid ment Environm Industrial/Municip Resident Environment al p tial al t pal tial tal suggested action y effectively RE uble and sol FOUL STE A TA OR FREE-CHL A AND NSF STA respe Ensures HA B PB n level of 10PP . EMOVES d both nd uble lead, insol E and ODOR a to t RINE according 3 4 ARDS 42 and4 y. ectively AZARDOUS c APP A c c ommerc APP c o m m e r c TER A ION T W UTI ONS SOL TIO r syste AT LIC te ial drinking wa WATER ATER ATER SOLUTION LICATIONS ATIONS ATIONS i a l d r i n k i n g w at e r s y s t e t t R N S ms R N S m s 800-523-022 Ensures HA AL CHEMIC with the addition gpm flow rest The 1LR fits all t housings tha t ar c 5 N AZARDOUS 4 | sales@campbellmfg.c PROTECTION 75 n of a Campbell 0.7 r er trictor coupling. te Campbell Mfg. filt accept 9¾" to 10" tridges. r r ersystems | esident p r e s i d e n t p te s.com er syste ial drinking wa ti pre and post r.o. fil a tr . filt er coole t vi a W fo ood ser i a l d r i n k i n g w at e r s y s t e t p r e a n d p o s t r . o . fil f i ltrati a ltr ltr Wat e r c o o l e t f o o d s e rvi ms on ers ice m s on e r s ice Industry NEWSLINE Pressure on EPA to Revise Drinking Water Standards T he lead crisis in Flint, Michigan has mobilized state and nonprofit groups to take a closer look at existing federal regulations surrounding drinking water standards. The Lead and Copper Rule, which regulates the amount of allowable lead and copper in plumbing fittings, was scheduled to be revised in 2017—but there is pressure to expedite reissuance of that regulation. Officials in Ohio, dealing with ele- vated lead levels in the town of Sebring, also publicly called for a complete over- haul of drinking water regulations. The head of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Craig Butler, has concerns over the amount of time com- munities have to notify residents of ele- vated lead levels. Butler argues 60 days is too long for residents to remain un- aware and steps should be taken to en- courage homeowners to voluntarily test their water. Meanwhile, the Natural Resources Defense Council is suing the U.S. Envi- ronmental Protection Agency, asking it to enforce a 2011 determination on allowable perchlorate in groundwater. A recently settled case in Oklahoma found perchlorate leaching into wells surrounding a former industrial site. Obama administration officials are being pressured to take some action to modify drinking water regulations. However, the clock is ticking to initiate a rulemaking, given a new administra- tion will take over in January 2017. President Obama Releases 2017 Budget President Barack Obama released in February a $4.1 trillion budget for fiscal year 2017, pressing his case on environ- mental and energy initiatives. The White House championed a joint cross-agency effort devoted to water innovation—noting $260 million in the budget is devoted to activities that boost research and data surrounding water efficiency and water supply issues. Given persistent drought in the West, the Bureau of Reclamation's Water SMART program will receive a 12% boost. Also, $88 million was given to the National Science Foundation to sup- port research to increase the U.S. water supply. The budget proposes $1.2 billion for the U.S. Geological Survey in fiscal year 2017—with the Water Resources Program seeing an increase of $17.3 million over fiscal year 2016 levels. Much of the increase goes to stream- gages, floodplain management, and aid for tribal water needs. The National Water Quality Assess- ment Program, which focuses on surface water and groundwater quality monitor- ing, receives an increase of $3.5 million over 2016 levels in the proposed budget. The budget did receive criticism for cutting the Clean Water State Revolving Fund by $414 million, in order to boost the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund by $157 million. The boost to that fund was largely viewed as a response to the situation in Flint, Michigan—re- ceived by some as a knee-jerk reaction and criticized by members of Congress on both sides of the aisle. waterwelljournal.com 8 April 2016 WWJ

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Water Well Journal - April 2016