SportsTurf

August 2016

SportsTurf provides current, practical and technical content on issues relevant to sports turf managers, including facilities managers. Most readers are athletic field managers from the professional level through parks and recreation, universities.

Issue link: https://read.dmtmag.com/i/701691

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 40 of 52

www.stma.org August 2016 | SportsTurf 41 IRRIGATION & DRAINAGE disrupting the hydrophobic supramolecular humic association, most prevalent in the top one to two centimeters on the soil, which lead to localized dry spots. Multi-branched Regenerating Wetting Agents. Most surfactants have linear molecules. These products have a much higher molecular weight and multiple branched molecules. Each branch essentially functions as wetting agent itself. Surfactants/wetting agents have been demonstrated to possess many functions in the management of water in and around turfgrass and other plant systems. When discussing the maximization of water use efficiencies, these products tackle the barriers (non-polar coatings in the soil) that prevent water from moving into and distributing throughout the soil. Research has shown that surfactants/wetting agents can significantly im- prove soil moisture content and reduce variability in soil water content, improving soil moisture uniformity. In addition, they have been shown to "reduce localized dry spot incidence, allow for longer periods between irrigation events, and reduce hand watering in isolated areas." Surfactants/wetting agents are available in liquid and granular forms. The amount of water conserved, longevity of the product and cost may vary based on product type and local conditions. There are a wide variety of technologies available to help manage and conserve water. As with pesticide selection, the key to success is to identify the cause(s) of water challenges. If salts or bicarbonates are a problem, there are calcium and acid based treatments. If non-polar soil particle coatings are the challenge, there are a variety of surfactant/wetting agent solutions for this condition. If poor water holding capacity is the issue, there are hygroscopic humectants and polymers. As a final note, it is advisable to remember to not think linearly. Often, there is not one single issue with one single solution. The best solution for the management and conserva- tion of water may be to combine technologies. A very common example of this is the combination of hygroscopic humectants with surfactants technologies. In this situation, the surfactant will allow water with the hygroscopic humectant to enter and disperse throughout the soil where hydrophobic non-polar organic coatings exist. Water can uniformly disperse through- out the rootzone. Then, the hygroscopic humectant can reduce evaporative loss for maximum plant water use. Thinking outside the box and using all tools available gives turf managers the ability to maximize water use efficiency and optimize turf and plant performance. Continued from page 37

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of SportsTurf - August 2016