City Trees

September/October 2017

City Trees is a premier publication focused on urban + community forestry. In each issue, you’ll learn how to best manage the trees in your community and more!

Issue link: https://read.dmtmag.com/i/871307

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 11 of 39

experienced at the junction. Second, where two branch- es or stems run in parallel and close together after aris- ing from a branch junction, the probability of the upper sections consisting of twigs, branches, and stems com- ing into physical contact with each other to form "natural braces" across that junction is much higher. By being braced by the touching or rubbing of branches, the normal gravitational and dynamic loading that the junction experiences will be lowered: some junctions come to be held completely static: and they do not get the mechanical stimulus to grow normally. My most recent research work has found that the formation of these natu- ral braces explains more than 93% of the bark inclusions present in a cohort of nearly 2,000 trees (Slater, 2017). Natural braces come in a number of forms, which my associated publication describes in some detail (Slater, 2016). Three types of natural bracing in the crowns of trees are shown in Figure 3. Note the associ- ation between these different bracing structures being bark formed at the top of the junctions gave rise to the weakest branch junctions. The question then arises: "What causes these malformed bark-included junctions to form?" Some authors have sug- gested that simply the angle of attachment could be the main cause of bark inclusions forming in trees. However, one can easily find tightly angled branch junctions with a well- formed branch bark ridge and, contrasting with that, wider angled junctions with included bark within them (Fig. 2). Component parts of trees (and other plants) respond to mechanical stimulus—a process known as 'thigmo- morphogenesis' (Jaffe, 1973; Telewski, 2006)—resulting in changes to branch, stem, and junction morphology, depending on the loading that they experience as they develop and grow. It is thus more common to find bark inclusions in tighter-angled junctions and this is for two main reasons: First, where the two branches or stems ascend vertically, almost in parallel from the junction, this greatly reduces the gravitational loading that is Figure 3 Three types of nat- ural brace found in urban trees: A: Entwining stems; B: Crossing branch on stem; C: Complex brace, involving other objects (a wall in this case) and other trees. Type A 12 CityTREES

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of City Trees - September/October 2017