City Trees

September/October 2017

City Trees is a premier publication focused on urban + community forestry. In each issue, you’ll learn how to best manage the trees in your community and more!

Issue link: https://read.dmtmag.com/i/871307

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 9 of 39

Assessing tree junctions is a key part of the role of a tree sur- veyor. As an ex-tree surveyor and urban forestry officer, I undertook my research to help others with this task of surveying and, more impor- tantly, understanding tree forks. Our research work at the Universities of Hull and Manchester, England, has identified a new model for branch attachment, based on using CT scanning and electron scanning microscopes to look at the arrange- ment of wood grain at branch junc- tions (Slater & Ennos, 2013; Slater et al., 2014). The basis of this new anatomical model is that, where a smaller branch is joined to a larg- er stem, the faster-growing stem occludes the base of the slow- er-growing branch, embedding it to form a branch knot over time. In addition, the dense twisted wood formed centrally under the branch bark ridge provides mechanical sup- port to the branch junction, and this is especially important for the strength of a branch junction where the two branches or stems that are conjoined are roughly equal in diam- eter, where a knot will be absent. Fortunately, you do not need to borrow a CT scanner or have X-ray eyes to see the wood grain patterns formed at some tree forks: in mature junctions of oak (Quercus spp.) and ash (Fraxinus spp.), the large vessels often allow the interlocking wood grain patterns to be visible upon debarking a specimen (Fig. 1). The presence of circular vessels at branch junctions has been reported by several authors (e.g. Hejnowicz & Kurcry´nska, 1987; Lev-Yadun & Aloni, 1990; André, 2000), but only recently has it been consid - ered that these beautiful grain patterns are associated with the mechanical properties of tree forks (Slater et al., 2014; Slater & Ennos, 2015b). As the wood formed under the branch bark ridge is a significant contributor to the strength of codominant branch junctions, it follows that bark-included junctions, where the branch bark ridge has not formed properly (or not at all) must be inherently weaker than a normally formed branch junction. In an experiment, we found gradations in the strength of bark-included junctions: these gradations were based on the position and extent of the bark included in the join (Slater & Ennos, 2015a). Unsurprisingly, wider areas of included 10 Dr. Duncan Slater is a Senior Lecturer in Arboriculture at Myerscough College, England. He recently graduated with a PhD in Plant Sciences from the University of Manchester, based on novel research into the anatomy and mechanical performance of tree forks. Figure 1 Debarked codomi- nant stem in Turkey oak (Quercus cerris), exhibiting whorled and dense wood grain at the top of the junction, which lay under the branch bark ridge. F O R K S A N D FA I L U R E S The Effects of Natural Bracing in Trees by Dr. Duncan Slater, Senior Lecturer in Arboriculture, Myerscough College, England

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of City Trees - September/October 2017