The Journal

February 2013

Issue link: https://read.dmtmag.com/i/106888

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 25 of 31

COMMUNITY LAW Keeping Your Litigation Costs Down By Arbitrating BY Dan Rudderow An unpleasant fact of life for any Community owner is that someday, somehow the Community may be the subject of a lawsuit. Whether the suit concerns a breach of contract claim, personal injury claim, rent control issue (the list goes on and on), the lawsuit is likely to require the Community owner to spend significant time, energy and resources (including attorneys' fees and costs) to resolve. Even with liability insurance to cover legal expenses (assuming it is a "covered" claim), the Community business is still affected by the inevitable "down time" in having its executives and employees speak to lawyers, search and collect documents and other evidence, appear for depositions and attend hearings in court (which always seem to last longer than expected). One way to help control and reduce the tangible and intangible costs associated with litigation is to have lawsuits resolved outside the court system through the process known as arbitration. The U.S. Supreme Court itself has noted the many advantages to arbitration, including that: • it is usually cheaper and faster than litigation; • it can have simpler procedural and evidentiary rules; • it normally minimizes hostility and is less disruptive of ongoing and future business dealings among the parties; and • it is often more flexible in regard to scheduling of times and places of hearings and discovery devices. (Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson (1995) 513 U.S. 265, 280.) So how do Community owners get their cases FEBRUARY 2013 26 THE JOURNAL into arbitration? Here are a few tips: Plan Ahead! The first step is to plan ahead and incorporate the arbitration process into one's contracts and residency documents. Whether it is a rental agreement, purchase and sale contract or other type of agreement, the Community owner (and his attorney drafting the document) should make sure that the wording of any arbitration provision in a contract is sufficiently broad to cover "any and all disputes" to ensure, to the extent possible, that most, if not all, of the many expected and unexpected business disputes that arise will be covered by the parties' agreement to arbitrate. In addition, the attorney drafting the agreement should specify the type of law (i.e., federal, state, local, etc.) that should govern enforcement of the arbitration provision should the provision be contested by a party resisting arbitration. Often times, attorneys consider federal law to be more "pro-arbitration," and therefore state that interpretation and enforcement of the arbitration provision is to be governed solely by the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"). However, for the FAA to apply, the contract itself must involve "interstate or foreign commerce" (FAA, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2). Accordingly, thought must go into analyzing how federal law might apply to the contract in order to make the arbitration provision enforceable under the FAA. This should be discussed thoroughly with your legal counsel. Whatever the strategy, careful planning should involve identifying the appropriate law governing the enforcement of arbitration and then making sure that intention is made clear in the contract. Don't Wait Too Long! Often times, in spite of the work done to make sure one's contract includes a legally valid and enforceable arbitration provision (or a separate arbitration agreement if required by your State's laws), one's opponent (i.e., the guy who signed the contract with you but now says he doesn't want to arbitrate per the contract's terms) will attempt to bypass the arbitration process by going ahead and filing a lawsuit in court. When this happens, it is often necessary for the Community owner to file a motion with the court asking the judge to issue an order to "compel" the other party to go to arbitration. Once again, the likely success the Community owner will have in "compelling arbitration" will in large part depend upon the enforceability of the arbitration provision in the contract. Assuming the provision is drafted properly and clearly, the trial court should grant the motion. However, it is important not to wait too long before seeking such an order. If the owner waits too long to file the motion, or, worse yet, participates in any significant way in the court case, then the judge may deem the owner's contractual right to compel arbitration has been "waived" even if the parties had a fully enforceable arbitration provision agreement. So acting promptly to enforce one's rights to arbitrate is essential! Keep the Case in Arbitration! The arbitration process is intended to serve as a comprehensive alternative means of resolving disputes. The parties go through the "arbitration process" which normally culminates in an arbitration hearing and an arbitration award.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of The Journal - February 2013