Good Fruit Grower

July 2013

Issue link: https://read.dmtmag.com/i/138107

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 5 of 39

Photo by AUDREy SEboLt Arkansas peach breeder John Clark says it is the young workers, the breeding trainees, who will make the best use of marker-assisted breeding enabled by the RosBREED project. T he four-year, $14.4 million RosBREED plant breeding project, funded in 2009 under the Specialty Crop Research Initiative, is coming to a new stage, winding down, wrapping up, summarizing, and telling people what's been accomplished. But it's also ramping up to convince the public to continue the project—because there's still more to come from supporting this kind of intensive, collaborative research. The project generated 14 new PhDs, 12 of them young plant breeder trainees looking for jobs in which they can carry the work forward. These young Turks fully understand what the project was about and are able to use what it accomplished, says Dr. John Clark, the peach breeder at University of Arkansas and a mentor to three of them. The project's goal was to enable marker-assisted breeding in plants of the Rosaceae family, which includes apples, peaches, sweet and tart cherries, and strawberries. These plants share many genes. What makes an apple red makes cherries, peaches, and strawberries red. Marked FOR PROGRESS Key genes labeled "jewels in the genome" set the stage for faster, cheaper plant breeding. by Richard Lehnert Drs. Jim Luby and Kate Evans, apple breeders from the University of Minnesota and Washington State University, respectively, made a brief presentation at the RosBREED annual get-together at Michigan State University in late May. They now know what parents to choose if they want yellow apples—or if they want to avoid them—and what crosses are likely to produce high or low acidity. They closed in on those genes that give Honeycrisp that wonderful, crisp texture, which, Evans said, "raised the bar" for breeders. It's almost mandatory now that new apples have that crunch. It's associated with a group of alleles at the Ma locus. Luby said the work enables breeders to tell whether a seedling carries a desirable trait without waiting seven years to see the fruit. DNA testing is remarkably cheap— maybe $5 a sample, he said—but it's unlikely that thousands of seedlings will be tested. The tool will be best used in choosing parents for making crosses, knowing that many of the seedling offspring will carry desirable traits. Dr. Amy Iezzoni, the Michigan State University tart cherry breeder, is overall director of the massive project that includes breeders from South Carolina, Arkansas, Texas, California, New York, Washington, Minnesota, Michigan, Oregon, and New Hampshire and European partners from the Netherlands as well. Tart cherry impact As the lone tart cherry breeder in the nation, she thinks she greatly benefitted from the project. "If it wasn't for RosBREED, where would tart cherries be?" she asked. Her goal is to create a clear-juice tart cherry, like Montmorency, that has large fruit and is resistant to cherry leaf spot. She has found that gene, but the fruit that came with it isn't desirable. DNA tests were developed to predict cherry pit and fruit size, cherry skin and flesh color, ability to self-pollinate, as well as resistance to cherry leaf spot. "These genetic tests enable tart cherry breeders to determine the best parents to combine and the best seedlings to advance, reducing the need to grow out and sort through hundreds of seedlings with unacceptable fruit quality," she said. Some results: "About 30 percent of seedlings from one experiment were discarded prior to field planting because DNA markers identified them as derived from unintended parentage. "Twenty-five crosses were designed based on their increased potential for transmitting red skin and light red clear juice color to the progeny." Sweet cherry impact "Genetic tests have been developed to predict cherry skin and flesh color, fruit size, firmness, and ability to selfpollinate," according to an "impact statement" developed about progress in sweet cherry breeding. Washington State University's Dr. Nnadozie Oraguzie reported that as a result of genetic testing of 7,000 seedlings, 42 were chosen as parents based on their genetic abilities to pass on desirable traits, 146 crosses were made using them, 16 advanced selections have been examined more closely, and 3,735 seedlings were discarded prior to field planting based on the prediction that fruit would be soft or flowers self-sterile. "Without marker-assisted breeding, approximately 3.5 acres of sweet cherry seedlings with no commercial potential would have been planted and evaluated," he said. "The projected cost to the Washington State University program of $75,000 was avoided." Peaches Four peach breeding programs came together under the RosBREED umbrella, bringing in processing peaches from California and fresh market peaches from South Carolina, Arkansas, and Texas. At Clemson University in South Carolina, Dr. Ksenija Gasic worked to develop genetic tests to predict peach maturity date and fruit quality traits such as texture, flavor, size, and color. She tested 310 peach selections, choosing 24 to use as parents based on their potential to transmit freestone, melting, or slow-softening flesh type, high blush, and bacterial spot tolerance. Forty crosses were made using them. At the University of Arkansas, John Clark had similar goals and used new DNA tests to select four cultivars and 6 July 2013 GOOD FRUIT GROWER www.goodfruit.com

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Good Fruit Grower - July 2013