SportsTurf

July 2014

SportsTurf provides current, practical and technical content on issues relevant to sports turf managers, including facilities managers. Most readers are athletic field managers from the professional level through parks and recreation, universities.

Issue link: https://read.dmtmag.com/i/338693

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 7 of 55

8 SportsTurf | July 2014 www.sportsturfonline.com Field Science | By Tom Serensits and Dr. Andy McNitt A s another football season looms on the horizon, coaches are finalizing game plans they hope will bring them season- long success on the field. Sports turf managers are no different but instead of wins, success means providing playing field conditions that maximize both playability and safety. The current heightened focus on athlete safety has increased the scrutiny of all potential contributors to ath- lete injury, including the playing surface. In fact, all NFL fields are now tested and certified before every game using a set of "recommended practices." These recommended practices include tests such as field hardness (Gmax), soil moisture, infill depth, and visual inspections, depending on the surface type. Much of the increased concern for athlete safety is due to a heightened awareness of the issues surrounding concussions. Research indicates that most concussions are the result of violent athlete to athlete collisions. However, this same research indicates that approximately 10-15% of concussions in American football are caused by the head hitting the surface. Consequently, the hardness of the playing surface can affect injury risk. By routinely monitoring field hardness levels, manage- ment practices can be implemented well before the surface exceeds hardness thresholds. For example, surface hardness of NFL fields is tested with the Clegg Impact Tester. The We have measured Gmax values well over 250 Gmax (Clegg) on dry, compacted fields. As a reminder, the NFL threshold is 100 Gmax. ›› UpdaTe on Field SaFeTy TeSTing Penn State's Pennfoot machine measures both rotational and linear (trans- lational) traction. Rotational traction is more related to injury risk while linear is more related to performance. For rotational traction, Pennfoot measures the amount of force required to rotate the shoe in the turf.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of SportsTurf - July 2014