SportsTurf

January 2015

SportsTurf provides current, practical and technical content on issues relevant to sports turf managers, including facilities managers. Most readers are athletic field managers from the professional level through parks and recreation, universities.

Issue link: https://read.dmtmag.com/i/442256

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 35 of 52

FACILITY & OPERATIONS 36 SportsTurf | January 2015 www.sportsturfonline.com pre season at a discount. By getting our mid-Atlantic stadiums on similar agro- nomic plans, we were able to meet some of these purchasing amounts in order to capitalize on the early order programs and bulk ordering discounts. This con- cept also worked with infield conditioner selection and mound clay use, once the groundskeepers got past personal preferences. Putting these stadiums on the same products also helped if one complex's supplies ran out, say due to a poorly timed thunderstorm, other sta- diums could meet the needs without the delay of purchasing processes. Partnerships and sharing is also about the exchanging of ideas. By getting turf managers together to determine agro- nomic programs the opportunity to learn from others increases. There are many different nuances to the cultural practices of verticutting and aerification. When we schedule the rotation of equipment, sharing of different cultural practice experiences are discussed. The conversa- tion naturally transitions into comparing the differences or similarities in the pro- cedures soon to be undertaken. We ask ourselves, "What practices are proving to be successful at another location that can be implemented here?" An inclement weather comparison between locations is another instance when information is shared. As with Brickman STS, if one of the stadiums was in the midst of a storm, that informa- tion of severity and timing was relayed to the groundskeeper downwind to be prepared for it. If one stadium is playing their game and another is not, why? Was it the weather patterns or is field drain- age of concern? This is true in the City of Peoria holding multiple tournaments concurrently, and also the weather sta- tion ET data collected is shared over the network with the complexes to control their irrigation scheduling. This sharing of information across the facilities aids in keeping operations and maintenance practices efficient. These are just some of the examples of developing partnerships between facili- ties to maximize resources by sharing equipment or employees, bulk purchas- ing, and exchanging of ideas for best management practices. Being creative with the resources that your organiza- tion has and integrating the resources of others can provide the means to improve your fields' quality. Remember, to avoid creating a situation or an impression of taking advantage of other facilities, sharing and cooperation should be more about the exchanging of ideas and helping others rather than forced expec- tations. ■ ST Brandon Putman, CSFM, is the mainte- nance coordinator for the City of Peoria (AZ) sports facilities.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of SportsTurf - January 2015