SportsTurf

January 2016

SportsTurf provides current, practical and technical content on issues relevant to sports turf managers, including facilities managers. Most readers are athletic field managers from the professional level through parks and recreation, universities.

Issue link: https://read.dmtmag.com/i/621615

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 40 of 55

ure out a way to pull cores at least 4 or 5 times annually as well as solid tine at least 6 times. Without closing fields! Right now we only have a brief closure in July and the fields are in play from March to November. Additionally, I have been considering which way to best change the soil physical properties to meet the new, higher demand. Sand is certainly an option but takes a LOT of product and a lot of time. It would take about 1,000 tons of sand to sufficiently modify the rootzone of one soccer field and we have seven. Not to mention football, lacrosse, etc. The labor and cost add up to beyond our means. I am looking at some of the Turface, Zeolite, Axis products as an alternative. No decisions yet. The second concern is using growth regulators more effectively. Labor is always the limiting factor in a municipal setting (as far as I can tell) and mowing 40 acres of sports fields three times weekly severely inhibits our ability to meet other responsibilities. Without growth regulators, I cannot drop to twice weekly mowing without suffering through grass clipping problems. So, we use growth regulators every 14 days to help keep labor free as well as all the other benefits they provide for turf. Due to constant seeding of highly used sports fields, conventional wisdom says not to use Class B PGR's (late GA inhibitors) like Cutless and Trimmit because of their root uptake and poa annua killing properties when used on the label recommended program. Only Class A PGR's (early GA inhibitors) like Primo are prevalent on sports fields for a con- tinuous program of growth suppression. The problem with Primo alone is that it has a life span of only 5-7 days in the heat of the summer. Back to the labor issue: it is not practical for us to spray more than every 14 days. So, through experimentation with a combination of Class A and low continuous rates of Class B PGR's tank-mixed, we were able to achieve fairly consistent suppression on a 14-day spray schedule WITHOUT damag- ing poa or impeding seed germination throughout 2015. But only on fields that are predominantly perennial ryegrass or predominantly Kentucky bluegrass. Fields with a patchwork of the two grass types did not fare well as the KBG takes much lower rates to suppress than the perennial ryegrass. So, 2016 will be dedicated to fine-tuning the rates and products to achieve ideal suppression that allows twice weekly mowing as well as aesthetically pleasing turf. ■ ST www.stma.org January 2016 | SportsTurf 39 Without growth regulators, I cannot drop to twice weekly mowing without suffering through grass clipping problems. — Rebecca Auchter

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of SportsTurf - January 2016