Better Roads

August 2012

Better Roads Digital Magazine

Issue link: https://read.dmtmag.com/i/85927

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 52 of 56

Editor Emeritus Kirk Landers Passing a Kidney Stone kirk.landers@att.net "A tie," football coach Vince Lombardi is said to have famously said, "is like kissing your sister." If we accept this wisdom from the Green Bay Packers legend, it fol- lows that the recently enacted federal transportation bill is like shaking hands with your ex-spouse's spouse … awkward, embarrassing and unfulfi lling. The ironically named MAP-21 (Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century) is easily the worst, most inadequate infrastructure legislation passed in the last half century. It is a two-year bill when fi ve or six years is a minimum practical need. It federally funds roads and bridges at less than $40 billion a year when $70 billion is widely recognized as a minimum need. It does not replenish the Highway Trust Fund, drawing instead on the general revenues of a dangerously overdrawn national treasury to cover the shortfalls. MAP-21 is not progress at all. It is more like a kidney stone that has taken three excruciatingly painful years to pass, leaving the host organism with a luxurious pain-free moment before the cycle of agony starts again. The best that can be said of MAP-21 is that it exceeds the sum of its parts. It is a better plan than either the House or the Senate bills that the conference commit- tee had to work with. The House "bill" was a pathetic tribute to the inability of today's Republican Party to solve a diffi cult problem; it wasn't a bill so much as it was a willingness to enact yet another short-term extension of the long-ago expired SAFTEA-LU program of the last decade. SAFTEA-LU was inadequate for its own times and has been extended for more than three years via nine short-term exten- sions, and the best the GOP leadership could offer was another extension with even less money for roads and bridges. Not that anyone should be gushing over the Democrat solution. Its sole virtue was a two-year time frame - grossly inadequate, but a half-notch higher on the courage scale than the House's extension. The rest of the Senate package was a plan to supplement the Highway Trust Fund with questionable new revenues and general revenues. The conference committee wisely adopted the House's proposals for streamlining projects and giving more discretion to state DOTs in how they invest their federal dollars, and it adopted the Senate's time frame and funding levels because the Sen- ate approach was less bad than the House's. We can blame this mess on the members of the House and Senate. That is the popular thing to do these days and it's fair to ridicule them for being so loudly and unapologetically ineffective. But we should blame ourselves too. We the people elected them and they very accurately refl ect what a divided, acrimonious citizenry we have become. We won't get a fuel tax increase until it's safe for a politician to explain to his or her constitu- ency that a fuel tax increase is the only intelligent solution. On a broader scale, we can't solve problems until we authorize our elected offi cials to acknowledge prob- lems and make the compromises necessary to create solutions that refl ect the con- sensus of the American people. 48 August 2012 Better Roads

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Better Roads - August 2012