Issue link: http://read.dmtmag.com/i/121480
The FTC says the disclosure needs to clearly and
conspicuously convey to the reader the relationship
between the promoter and the company. The FTC
does not mandate the words for the disclosure.
They have said that a general statement on the
"About" or "Info" page disclosing the relationship is
no longer sufficient. Every post, right down to every
promotional tweet, must disclose the relationship.
The FTC does not mandate exactly what words
to use as long as the readers understand the
relationship.
Some people suggest using a hashtag of #paid, #ad
or #spon which satisfies the disclosure relationship.
Is FTC Really Taking Action Here?
Yes! In 2010, Ann Taylor was fined for having
bloggers attend a conference and write about
the experience as well as the new clothing line
in exchange for a gift card. Neither Taylor nor the
bloggers disclosed their relationships. In 2011,
Legacy Learning was fined $250,000 for creating an
affiliate program which was endorsed by users and
the relationship was not disclosed.
For more information:
• The FTC's Revised Endorsement Guides: What
People are Asking
• Guidelines Concerning the Use of
Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising
Why is transparency about endorsements and
compensations in social media important for
conference organizers and speakers? How do you
feel when you discover that a speaker has been
compensated to favorably promote a conference
in social media for compensation and the actual
conference experience was severely lacking?
Jeff Hurt is Exec. VP of Velvet Chainsaw Consulting.
He is considered one of the leading authorities in the
meetings industry on adult education, conference
design, digital events and social media for events and
associations. He speaks and blogs frequently about
meeting and technology trends, the future of conference
education, adult learning and all things meetings at
velvetchainsaw.com