MSAE

Winter 2013

Issue link: http://read.dmtmag.com/i/221217

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 10 of 35

be done or should be done by staff experts rather than volunteers 3. no utilization: leaving human capital idle The micromanaging board is the most egregious form of suboptimization: a group of highly intelligent people— often with advanced degrees, decades of experience, and rare levels of expertise and knowledge—talking about what city should host a conference, whether a directory should be printed or digital, or what medium is best for an association initiative. It is a flagrant waste of human capital because it suboptimizes not only the board but also staff time and talent. Redundancies Another area of waste is in redundant systems. The best example of redundant systems in associations is in component or constituent associations in a federated structure. Many national associations, particularly individual membership organizations, have related regional, state, or local associations. But they all serve the same members and provide similar services. This results in massive duplication: accounting systems, database management, website maintenance, communication platforms. Would you develop a constituent structure with all these redundancies if you were starting from scratch? Absolutely not. Also resulting from redundancy is waste in the functioning of boards and their executive committees. It is a colossal waste, squandering the association's most precious human capital: the CEO and volunteer leaders. The executive committee often convenes for a meeting the day before the board meeting. It reviews agenda items, examines the association's finances and membership and attendance figures, discusses issues of the day, and makes decisions to present to the board the next day. Then, the board meeting is 90 percent passive review by the directors and 90 percent repetition for the executive committee members and the CEO. Rare is the Winter 2013 | Connections occasion when the board seriously challenges the executive committee's decisions. Process Improvement The following four steps are the keys to eliminating waste and maximizing your association's resources. 1. Define value for the member today. This will require internal analysis and member feedback. It will require challenging long-held assumptions. It will require asking a lot of questions. It will require accepting that member value may have changed over the years. It will require honest answers and the courage to act on what you learn. And, sometimes, it will require helping members understand what's valuable in a changing marketplace. 2. Identify all the steps required to get from concept to delivery of a program, service, or activity that has member value. In lean terminology, this is called "value stream mapping." Drawing a diagram of all the steps that occur in the life of the product is almost always illuminating. Processes are often more complex than thought. Sometimes there are more steps along the stream than were apparent. 3. Remove or improve any steps in the process that do not add value to the final product. The initial mapping will almost always identify one or two major opportunities to eliminate waste or accelerate the process. This validates the approach and reinforces the value of lean thinking. And, when done with a team of staff or volunteers involved in the program or activity, it can double as a valuable teambuilding exercise. the enterprise. Just about the time a volunteer "gets it," he or she is likely to move on. Staff has to own lean thinking in an association, even if volunteers are involved. Realizing and embracing the concept of continuous improvement represents a new horizon for associations. The benefits are numerous: reduced costs, increased effectiveness, accelerated turnaround time, decreased staff and member frustration, and, perhaps most important, enhanced value. As the competitive environment heats up, who wouldn't want to score in any or all of these areas? Mary Byers, CAE, and Harrison Coerver are strategy and planning consultants and authors of Race for Relevance: 5 Radical Changes for Associations. This article is adapted from their new book, Road to Relevance: 5 Strategies for Associations. Email: mbyers@marybyers.com, harrison@harrisoncoerver.com Lean Reads Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Add Value and Eliminate MUDA, by Mike Rother and John Shook The Complete Lean Enterprise: Value Stream Mapping for Administrative and Office Processes, by Beau Keyte and Drew Locher The Deming Management Method, by Mary Walton 4. Analyze the results and start the evaluation process over again to make continuous improvements. A challenge for associations that involve volunteers in the process is that volunteers come and go, while the approach must be continuous. It takes time, usually years, for organizations to fully embrace and incorporate lean thinking into the management of 11

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of MSAE - Winter 2013